64�65fold, lines of ght, what resists assimilation, what remains foreign even within a presumed identity, whether this is the intrusion of a minor language into a majoritarian one or the pack submerged within an individual. The outside or exterior is what both enables and resists the movements of territorialization and deterritorialization. It is what resists the globalizing sweep of the by now well-worn postmodern catchphrase here is no outside�(of discourse, of patriarchy, of history, of power), a formula that encapsulates the lures of signiation and subjectiation. What plays the role of the excluded or expelled in Derrida work functions in terms of the outside in Deleuze. Can the effects of depth, of interiority, of domesticity and privacy be generated by the billowing convolutions and contortions of an outside, a skin What does the notion of outside, exterior, or surface do that displaces the privilege of interiority, architecturally, philosophically, and subjectively The boundary between the inside and the outside, just as much as between self and other and subject and object, must not be regarded as a limit to be transgressed, so much as a boundary to be traversed. As Brian Massumi stresses in The Politics of Everyday Fear, boundaries are only produced in the process of passage: boundaries do not so much dee the routes of passage; it is movement that dees and constitutes boundaries. These boundaries, consequently, are more porous and less ed and rigid than is commonly understood, for there is already an infection by one side of the border of the other; there is a becoming otherwise of each of the terms thus bounded. It is signiant that Deleuze, like Derrida, does not attempt to abandon binarized thought or to replace it with an alternative; rather, binarized categories are played off each other, are rendered molecular, global, and are analyzed in their molar particularities, so that the possibilities of theirArchitecture from the Outside
